Hi,
I really hope that the great community of PHP can help me here.
I am currently with a development team going to start work on a whole string of web-based products, which ranges from e-commerce to client software-server interaction to content manangement. The team has a strong background in C++ and some of the members, including me, have done some personal developments in PHP. We talked over it and decided PHP would be a our best choice over other technologies.
Now this is where the problem comes in. My boss wants us to use more "established" technologies, namely, ASP, JSP, Lasso and CF. He would let us use PHP on the condition that basically, the team has to come up with a report about the benefits of PHP and why we should be using it instead of the others. I can see that his main worry is about the fact that PHP is free and open-source. I can openly admit that my boss has shallow knowledge about these technologies, but he is still a good boss. Here is a breakdown on HIS main reasons of wanting other technologies:
ASP - Backed by Microsoft. Most sites use it, and probably will never "die". Very established and to him, its the "in thing". Must pay for it.
JSP - Backed by Sun, another big company. Since Java is so renowned, this must be good.
Lasso - (no idea how he picked this) Looks good and since you must pay for it, it should be good.
CF - Backed by Macromedia. Very established too. Must also pay for it.
PHP - Free and open-sourced. Scares him.
In summary, he just trusts a technology which you must pay for.
I've included points that PHP is free, good DB interaction, powerful, etc.
I really hope that you guys can help me come up with some really good points to include. If we get to use PHP, I will be forever in debt to the PHP community.
Thank you.
Ron Baker
PS. I also have one post in the General Forum.