If I had put this question in the previous post, then people would first read my first question thinking that every reply had to do with the same question, and then I ask a different question which makes all the previous reading about the first question futile.
If I was the reader, I would be annoyed and tell the person to put this in a seperate thread, but you did the exact opposite, just goes to show you that only appointed members should act as mods, because every reader has a expectations and interpret certain situations differently.
And no, my two posts weren't the same, which is why their subject headings were different, it's the subject heading, just like emails, that define a post's content.
Please, let it go now, and with all this BS posted after my initial question, thanks to u, I feel like creating another thread because this entire discussion only sways away from the purpose of this post, which has to do with fuction calls.
If you don't agree and you know the answer to my function call question, then just don't post it.
You said: "Those posts were so close to the same it was pathetic, if you have code revisions like that keep them in the same post, it will go to the top after you post the code revision, and specify that that is what you are doing, and explain why you made a change."
No, there you go again, there is no need to specify why I made code changes because it's an entirely different question. Why would I explain why I made code revisions when this should be treated as different code and why I put this in a seperate thread.
Explaining why I made code revisions would have no influence to the answer that would be giving for the question in THIS post.
Thx
MK