Originally posted by eoghain
Now it may not have been the pretiest HTML but at least the various sections were identifiable for me to track down errors.
And that was the gist of my OP ... my brother only codes for his employer's site, (and deals will over a hundred users daily with only one assistant IT dude) but he's real picky about perfect looking HTML and CSS. That's fine ... he's salaried 😉
Me, I've got 8 or more sites either in development or in the maintenance phase, plus a "few fire and forget's" and I've got no one else working, plus I have LAN's in various offices and residential customers calling me everytime they get a virus or a modem zotted by lightning, (which this time of year is more often that some other times...)
If a site works, I don't much care, although I don't like to forget the "\n" 's as Sxooter says ...it's nice if it fits on a screen when viewing source. And, I'm never sure that the browser I'm using is "da bomb" when it comes to interpreting CSS (but that's another subject...)
I called my brother 'cause I was adjusting type sizes in CSS and it wasn't doing anything in the browser ... and we needed to figure out what containers were open, and which might be overriding another.
He has a good point, but cleaning up the code is going to take awhile, and some of my clients are probably getting near the point of not being so happy when they get my invoices.... :eek:
I guess it's like anything else ... use your head in each circumstance.
The source for the page we were looking at last night looks much better today 😃