Originally posted by piersk
Y'see, this is what I don't get. I can honestly say that I can't remember the last time I had windows crash on me touch wood, and thats both XP and w2k server.
I think the biggest problem with windows is that its reliability is determined to a large extent by the hardware it's on.
Fer instance, I had a machine where the power cable to the SCSI tape drive was iffy. I.e. the tape drive would lose power every so often and reset.
With linux, the only issue was that the tape drive was unreliable. Sure, you'd see SCSI timeouts go by in the kernel's syslog, and occasionally, the machine would kind hesitate for a second, but Linux never crashed.
Windows, on the same box, would crash EVERY SINGLE TIME the tape drive power connector juggled enough to cycle its power.
That's just one example, but you get the point. Windows behaves well when it's on perfect hardware with perfect drivers, and anything else is a recipe for disaster, Linux can run on marginal hardware and still be stable, as long as the memory / CPU aren't producing errors.