thanks for your concern mate.
however, i do know how to hard code html, xml, and a little of dhtml. i've been hardcoding my websites since forever.. i never trusted any WYSIWYG PAGEBUILDERS.. but since i tried DW, it's really professional. Now i'm not afraid of its outcomes. No it cant cope with all html stuffs like the full extent of style sheets, but i tell you one thing, the things supported is enough. I need not complicate things and delay project development.. DW is a professional tool indeed, finally, not just some company hype.
So yeah, going back to ZEND for website HTML design is just ridiculous.. why spend hours hard coding when you can achieve what you want in DW - with a little hardcoding help.
Hardcoding HTML is worst than flipping through ZEND and DW.. it's more like,
" code, preview your design, woops, a little off to the left... code again, preview again, hmm. howout this color.. look up rgb code for desired color.. type in.. preview in html again.. "..
and it goes on.. nope not me. I love hard coding and yes it feels good to hard code things, i admit, but it's just not practical anymore for HTML.. even DHTML since there are DHTML builders that are really good already.
On the other hand, PHP is something that's still to be hardcoded. there are a lot of PHP coding applications out there like AppGini, APWAB, and CodeCharge, but I tried them all, it's still not the same as hard coding. every situation is just so unique that sometimes using these software complicates the code more - sooo hard to debug.
well, we all have our personal preferences.... but for me, ZEND is for PHP and DW is for HTML.
Tea