Question about replication involving unix_timestamp()

[kid_c]

Hi,

For many of my queries on the master where time is sensitive, I use the function unix_timestamp() to set the value in my inserts or updates.

I've noticed that when the slave replicates, it then does this function putting its own time, not the value that the master inserted.

Is there anyway for this to work? If the slave lags behind, it can causes some problems.

Thanks

[Sxooter]

Use a different replication engine?