OK, I know I'm going to get laughed at here, but I am just now (with my wife) watching Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy for the first time. We just finished the first installment (Fellowship) and tonight we will start the Two Towers.
I read the books many moons ago and quite enjoyed them, and I must say the movie is really doing a wonderful job. (I suppose it should for $600 million!)
ALTHOUGH I READ THE BOOK, THERE ARE LOTS OF THINGS I CAN'T REMEMBER HOW THEY TURNED OUT, SO NO SPOILERS PLEASE. (though comments on the first is aok or the whole thing IN GENERAL...).
I guess the first thing I was wondering is: does New Zealand really look like that? I guess it may be the best place to film something like this because most of the rest of the english speaking world is unfamiliar with the landscape, so it carries a certain fantasy feel to it (though I notice that Jackson was definitely choosing the most odd looking formations as possible)
Also, I really like the characters. They aren't the typical "pumped-up" western heros that holywood has been inundating us with for the past 20 years. Rather they are simple and believable. The one guy who was part of the fellowship who gets blipped at the end of the first book (man I can't remember his name), he was tempted and even tried getting the ring from frodo, but he was really a passionate, courageous human being after all. And the prince aragon, he's kind of lame, but also a great warrior and has a kind of quiet virtue which you might expect from someone who didn't choose his high calling. And then I really like what Gandalf said in response to Frodo's wish that he never got the ring. He said something like, it is not for us to choose these kinds of things (I know I'm terrible at quoting) but we must decide how we are going to use the time that has been given us. I thought that was good.