Elizabeth wrote:And it's a shame that we can't all be on the honor system; I personally don't see why that's such a hard concept
I don't think that is the problem. A few people will always think of cheating, but I think more people than usually are here because of the ridiculous time constraint. 24 hours to code a useful library might be easier to swallow, but 24 hours to code a complete application from the ground up is sheer lunacy, IMO. Most people do have at least something of a life, families, jobs, and do tend to sleep. That leaves the average person with maybe 5 or 6 hours at most to actually do the coding supposing they don't want any down time to relax after a hard day's work.
I'm still up in the air as to whether I will participate or not, and it really depends on what the genre of applications we have to choose from are. And even when those are decided, I don't find it very likely I will participate given the near impossibility of the task.
For a 24 hour "throwdown" contest, I personally would be much more receptive to the contest if it was something more practical for the time frame. For example, a few different problems could be proposed, and the goal of the contest was to pick one and try to come up with the best way you know how to implement a solution to it. Then there would be something to judge on by comparison, and bragging rights could be awarded to different categories, such as most innovative approach, most unique approach, most elegant approach, most elaborate approach, most overly complex approach, most confusing approach, silliest approach, best overall approach, etc...
That does read as a "throwdown" to me, would be fun, and is also something that is possible to do within 24 hours, but hey that is just me. I'll keep quiet now.