sneakyimp wrote:As I understand things, the 'svn merge' command will make alterations to a working copy which must subsequently be committed to the repository.
Yes, but I don't think svn merge is necessary here.
sneakyimp wrote:Do I need to create a working folder of the revision he originally obtained?
Yeah, this is the approach that I would take. Just checkout the revision, replace the files with what the designer has now, then update, resolve conflicts and commit.
sneakyimp wrote:I'm guessing that if I were to make a working directory of the HEAD revision of the trunk and copy his files over that some of the existing bug fixes might be lost.
Yes, I would expect that too, since you would effectively be overwriting them with "new" changes. (Of course, they are not lost in that the changes are still in history, heh.)