Hiding with php html codes

Anon

Hi!

How can I hide with php, html codes from my visitators who are intrested to my html source code?

Ex:
how can i hide:

Thanks for your answer!

[deleted]

You can't.

Anon

nicely put 🙂

small explaination: if the browser can see the HTML code, and render it to make your page, what makes you think you could hide it from the user?? the transfer of the HTML code to the user is the FOUNDATION of how the web works. don't @!#$ with it.

and if you put something on your page trapping the right mouse button i will personally slap you with a large trout.

mithril

..... but a flounder will make a louder slap🙂

[deleted]

Stop this sketch! it is getting silly! 🙂

mithril

giggle, giggle.... sorry, couldn't resist🙂

[deleted]

"You must resist the temptation of the trout..."

rfrid

If you building for an Intranet and your organization is committed to IE then you could embed the majority of your code in an Active-X control. This will not work on Netscrape though (what will?).

[deleted]

Active-X controls... lol...
Why not build your own browser while you're at it? 🙂

rfrid

Actually, I build apps for many Fortune 500's and they deploy Active-X all the time. Most programmers shun from it because of security fears. Most large organizations realize you can do just as much damage with JavaScript so security is an issue no matter how you develop client-side code. Most programmer also tend to stay away from Active-X because it is purely a Microsoft solution and back when Netscrape was a viable browser they wanted to accommodate everyone. Nowadays Netscrape is virtually dead so this is less an issue.

Another reason web programmers avoided Active-X is because it is complicated, required compiling, and required more thought in distribution. It's easy once you've done it though. What takes you months to build in JavaScript can be built quickly and efficiently in Active-X and all your code is sealed from prying eyes.

Active-X is definitely not to be used lightly because of the deployment considerations, but, let's face it, Microsoft didn't invent it for nothing. It has its place. This thread was trying to determine how someone could hide client-side code and Active-X is extremely viable if you meet the conditions I pointed out earlier as well as if your not afraid of working in a compiled language. ;-)

[deleted]

lol

"Microsoft didn't invent it for nothing. "

Definately not, they invented it strengthen their monopoly on the browser market. Make something that other browsers don't support, give it a good commerial backing, and the competing browser dies.

Active-X has it's place, but in cases like you mention, you just end up writing a client-server app that uses a browser for the GUI.

rfrid

You appear to be very negative against Active-X technology. I get the feeling you are actually are more pissed off with Microsoft (not that anyone would blame you). The thing is, Active-X is an implementation of COM, which is really an international standard that has nothing to do with Microsoft. Microsoft was just the first to implement a COM container in their browser. You can’t blame them for taking the initiative and adding additional functionality to an already superior browser. Netscrape could have and still could do the same thing if they wanted to; nobody owns the rights to COM.

Client-Server would have you developing a Client-Tier that talks directly to a Data Tier via RPC. Implementing client-side Active-X has nothing to do with that at all, it is simply a wrapper for RPC (and you code) on the local machine. I don’t understand the point you are making. Any Active-X control I’ve ever built just provided client-side encapsulation. The methods and products were accessed and retrieved all client-side with final results being posted up via http using HTML or XML just like any other browser-based application. How you handle the manipulation of posted data on the server has nothing to do with the code running client-side.