Hi, and thanks for the response
Are we talking unix or windows here?
Redhat 6.0
A second processor allways helps more than increasing the single cpu's MHz,
especially if you are expecting to get many processes running at the same time.
Mmm, this makes sense, I was thinking about building a second machine that runs MySQL only, no apache etc, if I had, say a dual PIII 500
and 1/2 gig of RAM, would this sound robust/powerful enough
What kind of response times are you getting now, and what are you aiming for?
How many concurrent queries are you expecting? 1 million a month could mean 900.000 in one hour and 100.000 in the rest of
the month
Well this is the big question, I really dont know 😐
It's an offline site at present, until I finish building/indexing the database and the site that goes around it.
The 1Mil hits is what I'm planning to have in say a years time, but I want the infrastructure in place now, so I can only guess.
For a big-sh DB and a fairly substantial # of hits, what is a good benchmark? Say 50/100/500 concurrent transactions?
And how exactly will this "big-ish" table drive the website?
I'll be publishing circa 1% of the data to static files, so that most used stuff is cached, but the other 99% will be availiable by
searching
I envisage approx 5-6 transcation per page to get it loaded on the screen, the big table will be used for 50% of these
regs
Bealers